- ACan the sabha write into the lease a term barring any further acre from being leased without its own consent, and where such a term has been written in elsewhere has it in fact held?
- BWhat rent would the lease bring the village in a year?
- CHow many households of the village graze animals on the common?
- DWhich company proposes to put up the solar array?
Step-by-Step Solution
The objection is not that the acre is too dear or too useful but that the first acre must drag the rest after it, and that is a claim about whether the slide can be stopped. A term reserving every further acre to the sabha's own consent is precisely the stop, and asking whether such terms have held elsewhere tests it rather than merely hoping for it. The rent and the number of grazing households bear on whether the lease is a good bargain — a different question, which the sabha would still have to answer if the objection were withdrawn. The identity of the company bears on neither.
Answer: A) Can the sabha write into the lease a term barring any further acre from being leased without its own consent, and where such a term has been written in elsewhere has it in fact held?