- AThe demand should be held over and the 3,000 meters read afresh under supervision, since the board has itself declared the readings on which the demand rests to be unreliable
- BThe demand should be pressed, since the board's own readers are the only persons competent to read the town's meters
- CThe arrears should be recovered from the readers who entered the figures rather than from the consumers
- DThe board should raise the water rate so that arrears of this kind do not arise in future
Step-by-Step Solution
The board is asking consumers to pay on the strength of a record it has publicly disowned, and it cannot have the readings worthless for one purpose and good enough for another. What follows is to suspend the demand until the meters have been read by a means the board is prepared to stand behind, after which whatever arrears are genuine can be recovered. Pressing the demand keeps the discredited figures in force and the objection unanswered. Recovering the arrears from the readers punishes them for water the consumers drank and leaves the true consumption still unknown. And raising the rate is an answer to a shortfall of revenue, not to a record the board itself says is false.
Answer: A) The demand should be held over and the 3,000 meters read afresh under supervision, since the board has itself declared the readings on which the demand rests to be unreliable