Statement: Should companies be required to publish the average distance their employees travel to work? Arguments: I. No. Companies will simply refuse to comply with such a requirement. II. Yes. It sounds like a modern and progressive idea. Which of the arguments is strong?

Question

Accepted Answer

Neither I nor II is strong. Argument I is a bare prediction of non-compliance; the same objection could be raised against any rule whatever, and it says nothing about whether the requirement is worthwhile. Argument II offers only a vague appeal to being modern, with no stated benefit. Both are weak.

Statement: Should companies be required to publish the average distance their employees travel to work? Arguments: I. No. Companies will simply refuse to comply with such a requirement.
II. Yes. It sounds like a modern and progressive idea. Which of the arguments is strong?

Step-by-Step Solution

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

More Logical / Critical practice

Statement: Should companies be required to publish the average distance their employees travel to work? Arguments: I. No. Companies will simply refuse to comply with such a requirement.II. Yes. It sounds like a modern and progressive idea. Which of the arguments is strong?

Step-by-Step Solution

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

More Logical / Critical practice

Statement: Should companies be required to publish the average distance their employees travel to work? Arguments: I. No. Companies will simply refuse to comply with such a requirement.
II. Yes. It sounds like a modern and progressive idea. Which of the arguments is strong?