- ABoth I and II follow
- BOnly II follows
- CNeither follows
- DOnly I follows
Step-by-Step Solution
Every tiger is a cat and no cat is a dog, so no tiger is a dog: I follows. II contradicts I, so it does not follow.
Answer: D) Only I follows
Given that all tigers are cats and no cat is a dog, which conclusion(s) follow? I. No tiger is a dog.
II. Some dogs are tigers.
Competition practiceSyllogism
Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.
Don't just memorise the answer — build a daily practice habit.
Practice 5 Similar Questions Free →All Syllogism practice questions
More Syllogism practice
Statements: No doctor is a lawyer. Some lawyers are writers. Conclusions: I. No writer…Statements: No pen is a pencil. Some pencils are erasers. Conclusions: I. No eraser is a…Given: No apple is a mango. Some mangoes are bananas. Conclusions: I. Some bananas are…All doctors are graduates, and some graduates are players. Which conclusion(s) follow?…Statements: No table is a chair. All chairs are desks. Conclusions: I. Some desks are…