- ADrip irrigation is within the reach of every grower on the officer's list
- BRamnath's holding is not one of the cases in which the general rule fails to hold
- CNo grower on the list waters his plot by any means other than drip
- DThe officer's list contains every banana grower in the district
Step-by-Step Solution
The officer has a rule that admits exceptions and a conclusion about one named grower, and the gap between them is closed only by supposing that this grower is not one of the exceptions. Deny it — Ramnath's plot is on a saline patch where drip does not help — and the rule stands over the list while the conclusion about him falls. Whether drip is within everyone's reach bears on why growers differ in their use of it; a grower's use of other means of watering is compatible with the rule and with the conclusion alike; and the completeness of the list would matter if the conclusion were about the district, but it is expressly about the growers on the list.
Answer: B) Ramnath's holding is not one of the cases in which the general rule fails to hold