Practice30Create account

A city council claims that installing speed cameras along a stretch of highway reduced accidents, pointing out that accidents on that stretch fell by 25 per cent in the year after installation. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the council's claim?

Competition practiceLogical / Critical
  • AOver the same year, accidents fell by about the same percentage on comparable highway stretches in the region where no cameras were installed
  • BThe speed cameras were expensive to purchase and install
  • CSeveral drivers wrote to the council complaining about the cameras
  • DA few of the cameras were out of order for about two weeks during the year

Step-by-Step Solution

If similar stretches without cameras improved just as much, the fall is explained by whatever was affecting the whole region, and the cameras add nothing to the explanation. Cost and complaints say nothing about whether accidents fell because of the cameras, and a brief outage would if anything understate their effect.
Answer: A) Over the same year, accidents fell by about the same percentage on comparable highway stretches in the region where no cameras were installed

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

Don't just memorise the answer — build a daily practice habit.

Practice 5 Similar Questions Free →

All Logical / Critical practice questions

More Logical / Critical practice

The manager of a bakery argues that switching from plastic to paper packaging will…A school principal argues: "Our students' average score in the annual test rose this…A transport company plans to fit all its trucks with devices that alert the driver…An online retailer observes that customers who read at least three product reviews…A club secretary defends the club newsletter as follows: 'Our newsletter is the most…