- AOne of the two has been misinformed about the state of the road
- BEach is applying his own test of what the word 'motorable' is to cover, and on every question about the road itself the two are agreed; until the word is settled there is nothing between them that any inspection of the road could decide
- CThe pradhan is recommending a course of action while the engineer is stating a fact
- DBoth have relied on what they were told about the road rather than on what they have seen of it
Step-by-Step Solution
Send a third engineer up the road and he will confirm both men: the jeep does pass in dry weather and the loaded pick-up does not pass in the rains. The whole of the difference lies in whether 'motorable' means passable by some vehicle in the best season or passable by a working vehicle all year, so what looks like a dispute about the road is a dispute about a word. Nobody is misinformed, since neither denies a single fact the other states. The pradhan proposes nothing and asks for nothing; he asserts a description. And both are arguing from what they know of the road, not from hearsay.
Answer: B) Each is applying his own test of what the word 'motorable' is to cover, and on every question about the road itself the two are agreed; until the word is settled there is nothing between them that any inspection of the road could decide