Practice30Create account

In a debate on whether the town's weekly market should be shifted to a larger ground, one speaker said: 'This proposal was put forward by Mr Rao, who has twice failed to pay his own shop licence fee on time. There is therefore no reason to take the proposal seriously.' The speaker's response is weak chiefly because:

Competition practiceLogical / Critical
  • AIt does not explain why Mr Rao paid his licence fee late
  • BIt assumes that the larger ground is available for the market
  • CIt appeals to the opinion of the traders rather than of the shoppers
  • DIt sets the proposal aside by finding fault with the person who made it, leaving the proposal itself untouched

Step-by-Step Solution

Whether the market should move to a larger ground depends on space, access and cost, not on the record of the man who suggested it. A late licence fee, however unattractive, gives no reason to think the proposal itself unsound, so the speaker has said nothing against it. The remaining options describe gaps that would not repair the response even if they were filled.
Answer: D) It sets the proposal aside by finding fault with the person who made it, leaving the proposal itself untouched

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

Don't just memorise the answer — build a daily practice habit.

Practice 5 Similar Questions Free →

All Logical / Critical practice questions

More Logical / Critical practice

A software firm's sales pitch runs: 'Our accounting package is downloaded more often…A trade body argued: 'A law that is never enforced is no law at all. The rule requiring…The maker of a fabric softener states: 'No study has ever demonstrated that our softener…Consider this argument: 'Every application that reached the office before the closing…Consider this argument: 'Whenever the shop runs a weekend offer, its takings for the…