Practice30Create account

Passage: A city's household waste can be collected either from the doorstep or from shared bins placed on the street. Doorstep collection costs more per household. But in the wards where it has been introduced, the volume of waste left lying on the streets has dropped sharply, and the saving on street clearing has been larger than the extra cost of collection. The city should therefore extend doorstep collection to the wards that do not yet have it. Which of the following is the main conclusion of the argument?

Competition practiceLogical / Critical
  • AThe city should extend doorstep collection to the wards that do not yet have it
  • BDoorstep collection costs more per household than collection from shared street bins
  • CWhere doorstep collection has been introduced, the cost of clearing waste from the streets has fallen
  • DShared street bins are the sole reason waste is left lying on the city's streets

Step-by-Step Solution

The higher per-household cost and the larger saving on street clearing are both evidence; they are offered in support of the recommendation that closes the passage. That recommendation is what the rest of the passage is for, and so is the main conclusion. The fourth option is a stronger claim than the passage makes anywhere.
Answer: A) The city should extend doorstep collection to the wards that do not yet have it

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

Don't just memorise the answer — build a daily practice habit.

Practice 5 Similar Questions Free →

All Logical / Critical practice questions

More Logical / Critical practice

Passage: Employers complain steadily that fresh graduates lack practical skills. The…In a training batch of 60 people, 45 hold a driving licence and 38 have completed the…A shopkeeper says: 'Every item in my front window is on offer this week, and nothing in…Thirty parcels were delivered to a building that houses seven households, and every one…At a book fair, every stall that sells second-hand books also offers a discount on bulk…