- AOnly argument I is strong
- BOnly argument II is strong
- CBoth I and II are strong
- DNeither I nor II is strong
Step-by-Step Solution
Argument I names a concrete harm and points to a workable substitute, which speaks directly to the merits — it is strong. Argument II rests only on long practice; that a thing has been done for years is no reason to continue it, so it is weak.
Answer: A) Only argument I is strong