- ANothing is wrong — subtraction is commutative on rationals
- BHe applied commutativity to subtraction; the left side is but the right side is
- CHe should have used 27 as the common denominator
- DHe used associativity where distributivity was needed
Step-by-Step Solution
, while . Swapping the two numbers is allowed for + and ×, never for − or ÷. The denominator 9 he used is already correct, so that is not where the error lies.
Answer: B) He applied commutativity to subtraction; the left side is but the right side is