- Aoffers money already spent and beyond recovery as a reason for spending more, when the further 18 lakh is to be judged by what the finished hall would be worth against whatever else 18 lakh could buy
- Bassumes without evidence that the wind study was made by a competent person
- Cdoes not state how much of the 62 lakh has gone on the roof
- Dtakes for granted that the council will be able to find the remaining 18 lakh
Step-by-Step Solution
The 62 lakh is gone on both branches of the choice — finish and it is gone, stop and it is gone — so it cannot favour either, and the only live question is what 18 lakh more will buy. On the study's findings it buys a hall shut through its best season, which may well be worth less than 18 lakh spent on anything else the council does. Doubting the study would be a real objection if the chairman had raised it, but he does not dispute the study; he argues past it. How the 62 lakh was distributed within the work changes nothing, since none of it comes back. And the chairman's confidence about raising 18 lakh is a separate optimism, not the fault in the step he takes.
Answer: A) offers money already spent and beyond recovery as a reason for spending more, when the further 18 lakh is to be judged by what the finished hall would be worth against whatever else 18 lakh could buy