- Aassumes that the cobbler would keep his kiosk on the footpath and not on the grass
- Bdoes not state how large the park is
- Clays out a chain running from one kiosk to the loss of the whole park while giving no reason for supposing that the first step would bring on the second, or the second the third
- Dtreats the traders of the lane behind as though they were all of one mind
Step-by-Step Solution
Every link in the commissioner's chain is asserted and none is supported: he does not say why granting one man a licence must lead the municipality to grant a second, nor why two kiosks would draw a whole lane of traders across, and the alarm at the end of the chain is doing the work that the missing reasons should have done. A refusal may still be right, but not on this argument. Where the cobbler would place his kiosk is a detail of the same request; the park's size does not affect whether the steps follow; and the traders being of several minds would weaken one link without touching the others, which is a smaller point than the one the chain as a whole invites.
Answer: C) lays out a chain running from one kiosk to the loss of the whole park while giving no reason for supposing that the first step would bring on the second, or the second the third