- AThe terminal now used for the test was supplied by a firm empanelled by the state government
- BA candidate who fails the test may appear for it again after seven days
- CThe candidates appearing since the shift are not, taken as a body, worse prepared than those who appeared before it
- DThe office keeps a written record of the marks obtained by every candidate who appears
Step-by-Step Solution
A doubled failure share is what a harder test would produce and what an unchanged test put to weaker candidates would produce just as well, so the officer's inference holds only if the second account is shut out — that is, only if the candidates are much the same people they were. Deny it, and the whole rise is explained without the test having changed by a hair. The empanelment of the supplier bears on how the terminal was bought; the seven-day rule bears on what a failed candidate may do next; and a written record of marks bears on how the office keeps its papers. The argument runs exactly as it does whether or not any of the three is true.
Answer: C) The candidates appearing since the shift are not, taken as a body, worse prepared than those who appeared before it