- Adoes not state how many public taps were sunk in each ward
- Bassumes that every case of stomach illness in a ward is reported to the municipal body
- Creads a fact about wards taken whole as a fact about the households inside them, when the ward figures would stand exactly as they do even if the very households drawing from the taps were the ones falling ill
- Ddraws a conclusion about the whole town from figures gathered in some of its wards
Step-by-Step Solution
The figures pair a ward with a ward; the conclusion pairs a household with a household, and the two need not agree. Taps may have been sunk in the better-off wards, whose piped households stay well while the few families at the taps fall ill as often as ever — and every ward figure would look precisely as it does. The number of taps per ward is exactly what the note relies on and would not mend the step; under-reporting would have to be shown, and would tell against the figures rather than against this move; and the note generalises from wards to households, not from some wards to the town.
Answer: C) reads a fact about wards taken whole as a fact about the households inside them, when the ward figures would stand exactly as they do even if the very households drawing from the taps were the ones falling ill