Practice30Create account

A town engineer writes: 'A footbridge over the level crossing would take away every risk of a pedestrian being struck there. The town should therefore build one, whatever it may cost.' Which of the following is the chief weakness of the engineer's reasoning?

Competition practiceLogical / Critical
  • AIt does not say which department of the town would carry out the work
  • BIt assumes that the town engineer is the right person to decide such a question
  • CIt takes the removal of a risk to be worth having at any price, and so never asks whether the same money spent at some other spot in the town would take away more risk than this
  • DIt draws a conclusion about the whole town from what is true of one crossing

Step-by-Step Solution

A town has one purse and many dangerous places, so a safety work is worth building not merely because it is safe but because nothing else would buy more safety for the money. The words 'whatever it may cost' shut that question out. Which department executes the work and whether an engineer should decide are matters of procedure, and the conclusion is about this one crossing only, so nothing is generalised from it.
Answer: C) It takes the removal of a risk to be worth having at any price, and so never asks whether the same money spent at some other spot in the town would take away more risk than this

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

Don't just memorise the answer — build a daily practice habit.

Practice 5 Similar Questions Free →

All Logical / Critical practice questions

More Logical / Critical practice

The manager of a spice grading unit argues that the unit should sell its graded chilli…The manager of a tea estate reports that the green leaf brought in this year stands 22…A salt-pan cooperative holds that the wind pump it fitted last season is what raised its…A forest range office notes that the eastern beat's share of the fire reports reaching…A district blood bank's record shows that four years ago it collected 12,000 units in…