- AThe cheaper belting lasts about as long in use as the belting now fitted, so that a lower price for each metre also means a lower cost over a year of running
- BThe second supplier delivers to the workshop without a charge for carriage
- CThe workshop uses more belting in a year than it used five years ago
- DThe second supplier's belting is made in the same colour as the belting now fitted
Step-by-Step Solution
The clerk's evidence is a price for each metre bought while the claim is about what the workshop spends, and the two meet only through how long a metre lasts. Belting at 210 rupees that wears out in half the time costs more over a year than belting at 260, and the argument collapses. Carriage, growing consumption and colour do nothing to join the price to the running cost.
Answer: A) The cheaper belting lasts about as long in use as the belting now fitted, so that a lower price for each metre also means a lower cost over a year of running