- Adenying that the gang goes to the lane at all
- Bpointing out that the evidence the officer offers establishes something other than what is in dispute
- Cshowing that the officer's own figures contradict one another
- Dputting forward a remedy that the officer had not considered
Step-by-Step Solution
The officer proves attendance; the residents complain of condition. The ward member concedes the first in so many words and shows that it does not reach the second, since a drain cleared on Monday may be foul by Thursday. He therefore does not deny the visits, no figures are quoted by either speaker for one to contradict the other, and he proposes nothing — his reply stops at showing the evidence misses the point.
Answer: B) pointing out that the evidence the officer offers establishes something other than what is in dispute