- AIt assumes that buyers can be found for the extra printing
- BIt assumes that the press has been in business long enough to judge its trade
- CIt draws a conclusion about a whole year from what happened in a single week
- DIt treats a rise in what is printed as though it were a rise in what is earned, never setting against it what the extra printing costs — the higher wage a night hand draws and the power burnt through the night
Step-by-Step Solution
The owner moves straight from more sheets to more money, but a shift that costs more to run than it brings in leaves the press worse off however busy it looks. Only the gain is counted. The first option names a gap the owner has already closed with his opening sentence, since orders are waiting; how long the press has traded is no part of the reasoning; and no week's figures are quoted at all.
Answer: D) It treats a rise in what is printed as though it were a rise in what is earned, never setting against it what the extra printing costs — the higher wage a night hand draws and the power burnt through the night