- Atreats what would follow if the report were believed as though it settled whether the report is true, when the state of the federation's books is a thing to be found out by opening them
- Bassumes that the members of the federation are not able to judge such a report for themselves
- Cdoes not name the person by whom the report was made
- Dtakes the absence of any complaint from a member as proof that the entries are in order
Step-by-Step Solution
Eleven months of entries are either there or missing, and a run on the savings would follow the belief and not the truth — the books would be in exactly the same state whether the members panicked or slept soundly. The secretary has given the general body a reason to dread the report and none at all to doubt it. He does not say the members cannot judge; he asks them not to. He is not obliged to name the reporter for his argument to work, so that omission is not the error. And he nowhere appeals to an absence of complaints — he is answering a report that has plainly been made.
Answer: A) treats what would follow if the report were believed as though it settled whether the report is true, when the state of the federation's books is a thing to be found out by opening them