Practice30Create account

A safety officer argues: 'Fitting a second water tank on the roof of the warehouse will let the sprinklers run for twice as long as they can run now, and so give the fire service twice as much time to reach us.' Which of the following, if it turned out to be FALSE, would most damage the officer's argument?

Competition practiceLogical / Critical
  • AThe second tank would be bought from the same maker as the first
  • BThe fire service knows the road on which the warehouse stands
  • CThe sprinklers draw their water from the roof tanks alone and from no other supply
  • DThe warehouse has been inspected for fire safety within the past year

Step-by-Step Solution

The doubling rests entirely on the roof tanks being what limits the running time. If the sprinklers are also fed from a mains connection or an underground sump, the running time is set by that supply and adding a second roof tank need not extend it at all. The maker of the tank, the fire service's knowledge of the road and a recent inspection could each be false without disturbing the reasoning.
Answer: C) The sprinklers draw their water from the roof tanks alone and from no other supply

Master this topic in 30 minutes a day.

Don't just memorise the answer — build a daily practice habit.

Practice 5 Similar Questions Free →

All Logical / Critical practice questions

More Logical / Critical practice

A post office argues: 'Opening a separate counter for parcels will shorten the queue at…A hostel warden argues: 'Replacing the water heater with one of twice its size will put…The owner of a bookbinding unit argues: 'Buying a second trimming press will double the…A sugar mill's cane development officer notes that growers who attend the mill's monthly…A district trade body finds that shops in the cloth market which employ a night watchman…