- AOne loom that stood idle for eleven days last year was waiting not for a part but for an operator
- BTwo looms that stood idle for three days last month were waiting for a part
- COf the forty looms that stood idle for more than a week last year, nine were waiting for a part and the other thirty-one for an operator
- DThe unit holds more looms than any other unit in the weaving cluster
Step-by-Step Solution
The claim is about most of a group, so only a count over the whole group can defeat it, and nine out of forty is well short of most. A single loom idle eleven days for want of an operator is entirely compatible with the claim, since 'most' allows exceptions. The two looms idle three days fall outside the group the claim speaks of, and the size of the unit's stock of looms bears on nothing.
Answer: C) Of the forty looms that stood idle for more than a week last year, nine were waiting for a part and the other thirty-one for an operator